Metaeconomics Musings

(Update on 02/29/00.  You are at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln, USA).

Scholarly Attributes    

A recent book, Scholarship Assessed (Glassick et al.), highlights the need in a faculty hiring decision to think about the personal qualities of a scholar giving special consideration to Integrity, Perseverance and Courage.  In fact, these features may be substantively more important than "the school" where the individual studied, or even the technical skills the individual has accumulated.

Integrity is perhaps the foundation: Honesty.  Truthfulness.  Fairness.  Objectivity.  Regarding the latter, integrity seemingly requires (Glassick et al. citing American Historical Association, p. 64) “.. an awareness of one’s own bias and a readiness to follow sound method and analysis wherever they may lead.”  Integrity also pertains to standards of civility, which govern how scholars relate to one another as they engage in reasoned discourse... both within and outside the university... perhaps the most important feature of  a university community.

Perseverance makes it all work, as shown in a lifetime pursuit of scholarship.  In hiring, as well as in tenure, promotion, and the renewal of long term contract decisions, perhaps the question needs to be asked (Glassick et al. citing Booth, p. 64): “Is this candidate still curious, still inquiring... and is it thus probable that at the age of forty, fifty, or sixty-six, he or she will still be vigorously inquiring?”  Perhaps (Glassick et al. citing Mills, p. 65) this is “...a choice of how to live as well as a choice of career.”

Perhaps the most important quality is Courage,  the need to (p. 65) “...risk disapproval in the name of candor,” “take on difficult or unpopular work” and (p. 66) “...possess the courage of convictions so that... work ends up feeding the debates of the day.”  In fact, tenure is primarily for the purpose of encouraging and protecting the courageous who dig deeply for knowledge and true wisdom, and then share what has been learned, while continuing to learn, in dialogue with various communities of learners.   

All-in-all, we see a moral dimension, a value system at work behind the efforts of a scholar much like a value system undergirds the efforts of all other individuals.  A multiplicity of such value systems provide the glue holding the economy  and society together.

Glassick, Charles E., Mary Taylor Huber, and Gene I. Maeroff.  Scholarship Assessed, Evaluation of the Professoriate.  San Francisco: Jossy-Bass Publishers, 1997.

Return/Go to Metaeconomics Homepage)