Cornhusker Economics March 9, 2016 2016 Trends in Nebraska Farmland Markets: Farming and Ranching on the Margin
Agricultural commodity markets continued their decline in 2015 and 2016 as producers across Nebraska faced lower prices for crops and livestock. Lower values have resulted in tighter margins for servicing rent or debt payments. Preliminary findings from the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Nebraska Farm Real Estate Market Survey 2016 indicate that as of February 1, 2016, the weighted average farmland value declined by about 4 percent over the prior 12-month period to $3,135 per acre (Figure 1 and Table 1). This decline marks the second consecutive year of lower weighted average farmland values in Nebraska.
Figure 1. Preliminary Average Value of Nebraska Farmland, February 1, 2016, and Percent Change from a Year Earlier.
Agricultural Statistics District | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of Land | Northwest | North | Northeast | Central | East | Southwest | South | Southeast | Statec |
Dollars Per Acre | |||||||||
Dryland Cropland (No Irrigation Potential) | |||||||||
$/acre | 745 | 1,700 | 5,895 | 3,235 | 6,425 | 1,975 | 3,575 | 4,845 | 3,510 |
% change | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 | -4 | 4 |
Dryland Cropland (Irrigation Potential) | |||||||||
$/acre | 780 | 2,150 | 6,860 | 3,750 | 7,165 | 1,805 | 3,940 | 6,450 | 4,780 |
% change | -10 | -6 | -3 | -8 | -2 | -7 | -13 | -7 | -5 |
Grazing Land (Tillable) | |||||||||
$/acre | 585 | 1,425 | 3,970 | 2,595 | 4,510 | 1,070 | 2,260 | 3,200 | 1,550 |
% change | 9 | 2 | 7 | -1 | 7 | -6 | -4 | 5 | 2 |
Grazing Land (Nontillable) | |||||||||
$/acre | 485 | 740 | 2,535 | 1,935 | 2,805 | 915 | 1,690 | 2,305 | 980 |
% change | -1 | -1 | -2 | -5 | -7 | -3 | -7 | 1 | -2 |
Hayland | |||||||||
$/acre | 870 | 1,460 | 3,490 | 2,400 | 3,180 | 1,700 | 2,340 | 2,780 | 1,945 |
% change | -22 | -23 | -4 | -17 | -22 | -13 | -21 | -10 | -17 |
Gravity Irrigated Cropland | |||||||||
$/acre | 2,970 | 4,010 | 7,250 | 6,655 | 8,155 | 4,390 | 6,230 | 7,375 | 6,505 |
% change | -8 | -3 | -1 | -4 | -3 | -1 | -12 | -8 | -6 |
Center Pivot Irrigated Croplandb | |||||||||
$/acre | 3,220 | 4,350 | 7,995 | 7,440 | 9,480 | 5,670 | 7,030 | 9,185 | 6,990 |
% change | -11 | -10 | -2 | -5 | -1 | -2 | -15 | -3 | -4 |
All Land Averagec | |||||||||
$/acre | 820 | 1,270 | 6,095 | 3,780 | 7,025 | 2,010 | 4,140 | 5,685 | 3,135 |
% change | -5 | -5 | -1 | -4 | -1 | -3 | -10 | -5 | -4 |
b Value of pivot not included in per acre value.
c Weighted averages.
Rental rates for dryland and irrigated cropland declined about 5 to 10 percent across Nebraska for 2016 (Table 2). Higher rates of decline were noted for Western Nebraska compared to the eastern regions of the state. Grazing land and cow-calf pair rental rates followed suit as cattle prices and future cattle price expectations have retreated from record highs reached in 2014. Rates of decline were higher for regions that had record rent levels in 2015.
Survey participants reported that since February 2015, the largest price decline by land class of about 17 percent occurred in the hayland category. The reverberating effects of the 2012 drought and resulting increase in demand for forages to feed cattle led producers to increase their willingness to bid up the price of hayland through 2015. Adequate precipitation since the drought helped the grazing land across Nebraska recover. As hay prices dropped in late 2015 and early 2016, so has the willingness of producers to bid on hayland across Nebraska. Some of the highest rates of decline for hayland were noted in the major cow-calf producing regions of the state including the Northwest and North Districts.
Agricultural Statistics District | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type of Land | Northwest | North | Northeast | Central | East | Southwest | South | Southeast |
Dollars Per Acre | ||||||||
Dryland Cropland | ||||||||
Average | 32 | 60 | 225 | 100 | 200 | 42 | 80 | 165 |
% Change | -9 | -8 | -4 | -5 | -2 | -7 | -6 | -3 |
High Third Quality | 48 | 70 | 285 | 130 | 245 | 58 | 120 | 225 |
Low Third Quality | 23 | 50 | 190 | 80 | 160 | 29 | 65 | 125 |
Gravity Irrigated Cropland | ||||||||
Average | 125 | 175 | 275 | 230 | 285 | 180 | 215 | 250 |
% Change | -7 | -10 | -4 | -2 | -5 | -3 | -2 | -2 |
High Third Quality | 175 | 185 | 325 | 270 | 340 | 235 | 260 | 305 |
Low Third Quality | 100 | 120 | 220 | 205 | 245 | 135 | 180 | 215 |
Center Pivot Irrigated Croplandb | ||||||||
Average | 170 | 220 | 345 | 240 | 320 | 225 | 240 | 295 |
% Change | -3 | -6 | -5 | -2 | -3 | -10 | -6 | -2 |
High Third Quality | 260 | 270 | 405 | 295 | 375 | 265 | 280 | 355 |
Low Third Quality | 160 | 205 | 275 | 205 | 270 | 210 | 195 | 250 |
Pasture | ||||||||
Average | 12 | 26 | 74 | 39 | 60 | 24 | 40 | 54 |
% Change | -11 | -13 | -18 | -3 | -7 | -4 | -1 | -2 |
High Third Quality | 22 | 37 | 91 | 53 | 76 | 34 | 56 | 77 |
Low Third Quality | 9 | 20 | 44 | 34 | 44 | 22 | 27 | 38 |
Dollars Per Pair | ||||||||
Cow-Calf Pair Ratesc | ||||||||
Average | 36.85 | 63.85 | 59.2 | 58.3 | 56 | 58.35 | 49.25 | 52 |
% Change | -10 | -3 | -5 | -9 | -13 | -4 | -14 | -12 |
High Third Quality | 49.85 | 77.7 | 74.95 | 68.8 | 70.85 | 67.5 | 58.2 | 66 |
Low Third Quality | 26 | 52.85 | 51.1 | 44.05 | 45.85 | 49.15 | 30 | 38.35 |
b Cash rents on center pivot land, assumes landowners own total irrigation system.
c A cow-calf pair is typically considered to be 1.25 to 1.30 animal units (animal unit being 1,000 lb. animal) for a five-month grazing season. However, this can vary depending on weight of cow and age of calf.
Gravity irrigated and center pivot irrigated cropland reported the next highest rates of decline, about 6 and 4 percent respectively across Nebraska. The sharpest decline in the two irrigated land classes was reported in the Northwest, North, and South Districts at about 10 percent along with slight decreases reported in the Northeast, Central, East, Southwest and Southeast Districts. Dryland cropland with irrigation potential also followed similar trends across Nebraska. Survey participants indicated that financially sound market participants still have the ability to secure long-term financing at favorable fixed interest rates, but meeting annual debt payments on newly-purchased property with lower commodity prices remains a challenge.
Dryland cropland without irrigation potential or tillable grazing land noted small price increases in 2016 across Nebraska, but these may be noted as a relatively unchanged market for this land class. The financial resources necessary for purchasing this land class compared to the irrigated land classes typically require lower debt service payments and may be more appealing for those interested in purchasing land. Grazing land without the ability to be tilled indicated a relatively unchanged market as well with a 2 percent decline average across Nebraska. The largest decline in nontillable grazing land occurred in the Eastern and Southern Districts at 7 percent.
Rental rates for agricultural ground in Nebraska peaked in 2014 and 2015 for cropland and grazing land, respectively. As the value of commodities declines, tenants face tightening financial margins. Landlords in Nebraska have faced higher landownership expenses in recent years as property taxes have continued to rise. Survey participants noted the dynamics involved in negotiations on rental rates typically have centered on these concerns.
Irrigated cropland rental rates on average declined about 5 percent across Nebraska. Regions that recorded the largest drops of 10 percent include the North District for gravity irrigated cropland and the Southwest district for center pivot irrigated cropland. The rates of decline were slightly lower in the eastern third of the state as the Northeast, East, and Southeast Districts recorded trends ranging down from 2 to 5 percent. Producers face a higher rate of decline in their expected crop revenue given the fall in commodity prices.
Pasture and cow-calf pair rental rates which set records in 2015 declined around 5 to 10 percent across Nebraska. The average monthly rental rate for a 5-month grazing season averaged about $55 per month or $275 for the grazing season. Survey respondents noted the differences in the rental rate ranges reported across the state may be attributed to the level of service that the landlord provides to the tenant as part of the lease. In areas where higher rates were paid, the landlord may take care of maintaining fence lines, controlling noxious weeds, or watching the tenant’s cattle if the lessee does not live near the property. The norm among landlords and tenants for the renting of grazing land and the level of services either party provides in the rental arrangement varies substantially depending upon area and the capacity of each individual involved.
Survey results shown and discussed in this report are preliminary findings from the University of Nebraska–Lincoln 2016 Nebraska Farm Real Estate Market Survey. Land values and rental rates presented in this report are averages of survey participants’ responses by district. Actual land values and rental rates may vary depending upon the quality of the parcel and local market for an area. Also, preliminary land values and rental rates are subject to change as additional surveys are returned. Final results from the survey will be published in the first week of June 2016 and will be available on the Nebraska Farm Real Estate website.
Land appraisers, farm managers, or agricultural finance professionals from Nebraska interested in participating in future Nebraska Farm Real Estate Market Surveys are invited to contact the Department of Agricultural Economics at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Interested parties can contact Jane Witte by phone: (402) 472-1913 or email: janewitte@unl.edu.
Jim Jansen
Nebraska Extension
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
jjansen4@unl.edu , (402) 254-6821
Roger Wilson
Department of Agricultural Economics
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
rwilson6@unl.edu , (402) 472-1771
Topic: